In Praise of Corsairs and Belters

My first baseball cards were 1967 Topps, which I discovered when I was a wee lad of six. Within a very short time, as I have explained, I used my cards in order to follow real baseball teams. I organized my cards by teams and made lineups based on the day’s box scores. I never knew what to do with the checklists, league leaders, World Series cards, and the like. Should I use the NL Batting Leaders card as a place-holder until I got Matty Alou? I might have done that.


One group of cards I liked very much were those that pictured two or three players above a cute, often alliterative, title. Pitt Power — what a pair of words that was. Just as great was the back of the card, which was nothing but text. Understand, when I first saw this card I had little idea who these people were, and I wanted to learn. The fact that Topps put these happy-looking men on this card was proof that they were players to be reckoned with, and the news that Clendenon had once “paced the circuit” in home runs, albeit seven years earlier in the Sally League (whatever that was), sealed the deal. Phrases like “paced the circuit” became part of my language, along with “first sacker,” “blasted,” and “round-tripper,” all used here as well.

I knew right then what I wanted to do when I grew up: write the text on the front and backs of these cards. In 1967, Topps gave us 13 of them, with such wonderful titles as Cards’ Clubbers, Mets Maulers, Bengal Belters, and Hurlers Beware. And you can bet the backs had a fair bit of fence-busting, circuit-blasts and two-baggers. Warning: if we ever meet, I pretty much still talk like this today.

Martin and Rizzuto
Berra, Bauer, Mantle
Berra, Bauer, Mantle

Credit for multiplayer cards, at least in the modern era, belongs to Bowman Gum, which produced two multi-player cards in their 1953 set, five famous players from the perennial World Champions. The cards had no text on the front, like all the Bowman cards that year, and card backs filled with prose. In their remaining two years of operation, Bowman never tried this again.

Four years later, Topps brought these cards back and this time they stuck. Topps made 107 multiplayer cards over a 13 year period (1957-1969). I am not going to go through every one of them, we don’t have all day here. Suffice to say that I like all 107 of them.

These cards depicted either two (72 times), three (29 times), or four (6 times) people, usually players but occasionally a manager or coach. Often they were just standing around being awesome, but sometimes they were talking, exchanging baseball nuggets.

Here are a few of my favorite examples.

1959 Topps

Three times Topps referred to a pair of players as Fence Busters. Besides Aaron and Mathews above, they had used the phrase with Mantle and Snider in 1958, and brought it back for Mays and McCovey in 1967. Topps used similar terms through the years (clouters and sockers and belters), often for players who were quite a bit less worthy than Henry and Eddie. But Fence Busters seems to have been set aside for the cream of the crop.

1969 Topps

Ted Williams signed a contract to manage the Senators in February 1969, quite late in the off-season for baseball card purposes, but Topps took photos of Williams in spring training and put him on his own late-series card plus this one of him teaching a mortal how to hit. Oddly, the Senators had already put the previous manager (Jim Lemon) on a card in an earlier series.

I recall as an 8-year-old seeing “Ted Shows How” on the checklist and wondering what it could possibly be. Much like kids must have puzzled over “Words of Wisdom” or “Lindy Shows Larry” a few years earlier.

1968 Topps

Of these 107 multiplayer cards Topps depicted at least one (future) Hall of Famer 58 times. Often there were a pair of immortals on the card, and one time — this card right here — Topps struck gold with three players destined for Cooperstown. What’s not to like?

The photo was taken at the 1964 All-Star game at Shea Stadium. Topps used a few other All-Star game photos over the years (what better time to find pair of star players), and the 1967-68 player boycott required that they find some older photos.

1964 Topps

The vast majority of these multiplayer cards employed titles meant to praise the players — clubbers, maulers, aces, heroes, etc. With the above card Topps stayed on firmer ground, telling us only that the depicted men were Angels, and were catchers. On the back, we learn that they are both “fine handlers of pitchers [who] know when to call for the right pitch in the right situation.” As for their hitting, Topps wisely ignored their unimpressive major league resumes so they could brag about long ago successes in the minors (13 years earlier in Ed’s case.)

I know that Keith Olbermann has spent time researching the Topps photo archive, and I recently asked him whether he’d ever run across multiplayer groupings that were not used — indicating that Topps took a bunch of these every year and selected a subset of them to produce. Keith said he’d only seen a couple of new groupings, which suggests that Topps mostly printed what they got. The photographer was likely snapping some photos and said, “hey, come over here and let me get you both.” On this day, the two Angel backstops might have been warming up pitchers at the same time, and here we are.

1962 Topps

This photo of the two biggest stars in baseball was taken at the 1961 All-Star game at Boston’s Fenway Park. You can also make out Elston Howard, John Roseboro and Henry Aaron engaged in witty banter behind them. Oh, to have been wandering around the field on that day.

1967 Topps

This is one of my all-time favorite cards, because of its breathtaking beauty. The sunny day, the uniforms, the matching “on-deck” stances. Cardboard perfection.

The title is wonderfully alliterative, if perhaps an odd way to refer to men known for their speed on the bases and in the outfield. But I shall not quibble nor debate this card.

1957 Topps

“I see the boys of summer in their ruin.”

When this card reached store shelves in late summer of 1957, these four wonderfully talented men could not have realized what lay ahead for their careers, or their team, or their city. Their expressions showed nothing but the justifiable pride and happiness for all they had accomplished thus far. Why shouldn’t it last forever?


In their 1969 set Topps used four multiplayer cards, this being the final of the four in the checklist. And then, for whatever reason, it was all over. The multiplayer card was retired.

I have never heard an explanation for why. Its not as if Topps stopped other non-base cards — they still put out team photos, and tried “Boyhood Photos” or “Record Breakers.” These cards seemed to be very popular, and comparatively easy to put together. You just need someone to write 200 words on the back. Hell, I would have done it for free.

I consider these 107 cards, spread over 13 years, to be their own special subset, and if you have not yet experienced them I suggest you find some.  If filling in all of these old Topps sets is too much for your budget, how about just getting these 107 cards? There is no better way to celebrate the game and the era.

As for me, I need to figure out a way to make a poster, something more attractive than my feeble attempt below.


Author: Mark Armour

Long-time SABR member, founder and past chairman of the Baseball Cards Committee, founder and past chairman (2002-2016) of the Biography Project, current President of the SABR board of directors, author of several books and dozens of articles on baseball. See

17 thoughts on “In Praise of Corsairs and Belters”

  1. First of all, I love your blog. Fantastic stuff. I have always had a fondness for multi-player cards because it seemed like a less expensive way to get a card of a superstar — the price, for example of a Hank Aaron card was much more than a Aaron/Matthews double card. Plus, you get both guys. Love it. My favorite multi-player card is the 1967 “The Champs” card with the two Robinsons and Earl Weaver. Lots of baseball greatness on that one.


  2. Such a wonderful subject. Two of my all-time favorites are the Dodgers Sluggers card above (which I spent really money to acquire, some decades ago) and Casey Teaches (which I recently gave to a friend). Oh, and thanks for showing the Rizzuto-Martin Bowman card; never seen that beauty before!

    Liked by 1 person

  3. As mentioned above, Fleer revived the format in the ’80s and produced some decent ones (although nothing on the scale of “Card Clubbers” — I’ve written about how I spotted that card in a glass case at a pawn shop and just stood there and drooled for 5 minutes). Topps tried to revive it around 2005, 2006 and continued for a few years, but it was not executed well.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Shoot me an email and I’ll send you a picture of my baseball card display. It might give you an idea on how to display yours!


  5. Fantastic! A fun read, and I recall those tandem cards with great zeal as they fell into my hands in the 1960s. I hope you’ll do a story on the World Series cards. Possibly my fave of all time of those cards was the 1966 set’s WS cards, with the bad television bezel, feting the immortal Moe Drabowsky, with “Moe Mows Down Eleven”.


  6. An early card in the ’63 Topps set, “Buc Blasters” had Dick Stuart along with Clemente, Skinner and Burgess. Stuart had been dealt to the Red Sox, as the back of the card notes, but I guess this group photo was too good to pass up. That it features “Bob” Clemente — as the card back and his own individual card in this set identify him. How long did Topps keep that up? — makes it pricey today.


  7. Like you, Mark, my introduction to baseball card collecting was that amazing 1967 set . . . it’s still my favorite, and I think my attitude toward what makes a good baseball card and a good card set were forged that year.

    Without question, the ’67 set was the high-water mark of multiplayer cards, with more of them than in any other set, usually featuring the best players on the respective teams (although, as much as I love the “Sox Sockers” card of Pete Ward and Don Buford from my White Sox, why couldn’t they have done a “Southside Slingers” card instead featuring Peters, Horlen and John?). If nothing else, they helped my 10-year-old mind understand the power of alliteration . . .

    If some of its predecessors were the result of a happy accident of two players being available at the same time, the ’67 multiplayers come across as being a deliberate attempt to feature the top players on a variety of teams in a posed setting. It’s what baseball card art was all about in the ’50s and ’60s, before Topps began its love affair with game-action photos that really didn’t translate well in a 2 1/2 x 3 1/2 inch frame.

    Those collectors who have kept up with Topps’ current releases will know that the Heritage line has featured the designs of the latter half of the ’60s the past five years, and one way in which Topps has utterly failed to recreate the old sets is in the multiplayer cards. None of them are posed, all are just happy accidents from game action. That, and the rather dull finish of the cards compared to the original (and the lack of checklists with disembodied heads of star players) is why the 2016 Heritage set fell flat for me. Is it really that tough to get two player to get together in a baseball-card-style pose? But it makes me think of some of the things Keith Olbermann has said in recent years, alluding to the almost complete loss of institutional memory at Topps. They really haven’t done a decent muliplayer card since the ’60s, despite bringing the concept back here and there many times for subsets or insert sets since then. ‘Tis a shame . . .


  8. Great post! I love the multi-player cards, and have managed to acquire all the examples showing Pirates. I first encountered them when I was building the 1967 Topps set. I’ve convinced myself I need the 1968 Super Stars card, but haven’t pulled the trigger yet.
    Thanks and have a great day! ⚾️


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: